1. SNAP como Subsidio a la Codicia Corporativa.
Una crítica recurrente es que el programa SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) funciona esencialmente como bienestar corporativo, permitiendo a las grandes empresas externalizar sus costos laborales al contribuyente.
- Snap is a symptom of a massive capitalist problem in us disgustingly rich people screwing over their employees with low wages.
- Snap is another corporate welfare program. Fucking pay your employees a livable wage, ceos who are paid tens of millions.
- Snap is corporate welfare. It allows businesses to get out of paying a livable wage and shifts the responsibility of ensuring their workers dont starve to the taxpayers.
- Snap is a subsidy for corporations that are unwilling to pay a living wage while their ceos are paid more in a month than many americans will earn in their lifetime.
2. Walmart, Amazon y McDonald's: Los Mayores Beneficiarios.
Walmart, Amazon y McDonald's son señalados consistentemente como los principales empleadores cuyos trabajadores dependen de SNAP. Esta dependencia se percibe como una estrategia de negocio intencional para maximizar ganancias.
- Walmart mcdonalds have the most employees on snap. Employees who work 40 hours per week dont make enough to cover their living expenses. Businesses are the real welfare queens.
- Not to mention the fact that amazon and walmart employees comprise something like 30 of snap benefit recipients. We have to subsidize their damn unliveable wages!
- Walmart is the largest employer of snap recipients all while getting huge tax breaks. These are working people being robbed by corporate greed.
- Walmart, mcdonalds and amazon are the largest employers of people who require snap assistance.
- Snap is corporate welfare to walmart. The corporations dont pay their employees a livable wage. Then the employees have to get on snap then they use their snap to spend at walmart.
3. La Mayoría de los Receptores de SNAP Están Trabajando.
Contrario a la narrativa de que los beneficiarios son "vagos" o "no trabajan", el archivo enfatiza que una gran parte de los adultos que reciben SNAP están empleados, a menudo a tiempo completo, pero sus salarios son insuficientes para cubrir las necesidades básicas.
- 70 of people who receive snap benefits are working.
- Real talk people working shouldnt have to rely on snap benefits. Pay a living wage ahem walmart, amazon.
- Over 80 of people on snap work! walmart is the biggest welfare cheat in america.
- Most snap recipients have jobs. Some more than one. Sis, here needs to take her self centered asses complaint to the walmarts and dennys of america, whose wages are so low that her taxes are subsidizing their fucking employees wages via snap.
- If someone works full-time and receives snap, that means your taxpayer dollars are subsidizing the companys profits bc it refuses to pay them a livable wage.
4. Demandas de Salario Digno y Responsabilidad Corporativa.
La solución más citada para reducir la dependencia de SNAP es aumentar el salario mínimo a un nivel de vida digno. También se proponen mecanismos para penalizar a las corporaciones que dependen de los subsidios públicos para mantener a su fuerza laboral.
- If people got a living wage, few would need snap.
- Raise the damn minimum wage already!
- We should fund snap through the corporations whose employees receive snap because they are not paid a living wage.
- Snap is a corporate subsidy. Pay workers a living wage and 22m people half the beneficiary pool would not need food assistance.
- Fine every company that has employees on snap as they are not fulfilling their obligations to pay a living wage to their employees. 10k per employee.