1. Acusaciones Directas de Racismo y Sexismo.
Los comentarios se centran en señalar el racismo y el sexismo como pilares fundamentales del discurso de Charlie Kirk, describiéndolos no como opiniones políticas, sino como convicciones sinceras utilizadas para ganar seguidores y promover una visión de dominación masculina y blanca.
- Kirk thrived on division, using racism and sexism to build his following. He gave white supremacists a voice and echoed the maga/project 2025 vision of a white, male-dominated america.
- Charlie kirk epitomizes the racism and the sexism underlying the rights dei opposition.
- Actually charlie kirk was a sincere racist and misogynist. His racism was sexism were straight from his heart.
- 'any reflection on kirk’s legacy must grapple with the racism and sexism he broadcast to millions under the guise of “truth-telling”.'.
2. Promoción del Odio y la Intolerancia.
Se describe a Kirk como un "fanático odioso" cuya carrera se basó en la difusión de odio, intolerancia y crueldad contra diversos grupos, incluyendo personas no blancas, la comunidad LGTBQ+ y mujeres. Su discurso es calificado como peligroso y perjudicial para las minorías.
- Charlie kirk was a hateful bigot who spread a lot of racism, sexism, endorsements of violence, and cruelty into the world.
- In his own words, what kirk sold was bigotry, fear, sexism, hate. See and hear for yourself & share widely.
- Charlie kirk was an odious bigot, who espoused sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and, above all, white supremacy. That he was killed doesn’t make him or his views any less odious.
- This is a man who wrapped hate, bigotry, racism, sexism, and homophobia in a fluffy bunny suit to make the horrible things he preached seem okay.
3. Rechazo a la Santificación de su Legado.
A pesar de condenar su asesinato, los autores insisten en no "blanquear" su figura ni convertirlo en un mártir. Argumentan que es crucial recordar el daño que causó y no excusar su retórica de odio, criticando los intentos de presentarlo como una figura civil o moderada.
- We can condemn violence without whitewashing and excusing harm that the victim perpetrated prior to his death.
- His murder was not okay; that does not excuse the things he regularly said in life.
- The right-wing is whitewashing kirk’s racism, sexism, and attacks on those he disagreed with ,portraying kirk simply as a christian motivational speaker attacked by a rabid left wing.
- You can say that no-one should be violently killed and still tell the truth about what that person actually stood for in life. Whitewashing kirk's vile racism, sexism and homophobia only moves the fascist project along.
4. Vínculos con la Violencia y las Armas.
Varios comentarios conectan la retórica de Kirk con la normalización de la violencia. Se le acusa de fomentar una cultura que justifica la violencia y de ser un firme defensor de la posesión de armas, una postura que algunos consideran irónica dado su trágico final.
- Charlie kirk has contributed to a culture that not only normalizes but encourages racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, exploitation, rape, assault, abuse, violence, and murder.
- Kirk's assassination is an atrocity. His killer should be caught, tried, & punished to the extent of the law. Charlie kirk also espoused racism, sexism and hatred. He was a homophobe, & a proponent of unchecked firearm ownership. He's a victim of his own beliefs.
- They talk on the right about kirk speaking his mind. Correction: kirk was speaking his hatred, his racism, his sexism -- and his love of guns, which came back to bite him in the end, ironically.
- He believed gun rights outweighed the cost of lives murdered by guns.