1. La Autoridad Constitucional para Imponer Aranceles.
El punto central de la discusión es que la Constitución de EE. UU. otorga explícitamente el poder de establecer aranceles (deberes, impuestos) al Congreso (Rama Legislativa), no al Presidente (Rama Ejecutiva).
- Congress has the power to set tariffs, not the president. Trump has way overstepped his authority, and dem ags are holding him accountable. .
- Article i, section 8, of the constitution states congress has the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises. Duties and imposts are synonyms for tariffs. This clause gives congress sole authority to set them.not donald trump.
- Tariffs are taxes. And trump is too stupid to understand that the constitution reserves taxation power with the legislative branch.
2. Aranceles como Impuestos Pagados por Estadounidenses.
Se enfatiza repetidamente que los aranceles no son pagados por países extranjeros, sino que son impuestos que recaen sobre los consumidores y negocios estadounidenses, lo cual refuerza el argumento de que su imposición es una extralimitación del poder presidencial.
- One more time for the magas trump is lying multiple times here. A tariff is not paid by a foreign country, it is a tax paid by americans on the import of goods from those countries.
- So trump admits tariffs are a tax paid by u.s. Consumers. Finally.
- Tbc a tariff is different than an embargo is because the us constitution gives that power to congress because a tariff is paid by a us company or an american buying that product. It is a tax must be levied by congress not the whim of dt. Potus stop lying.
3. El Motivo del Presidente: Poder y Control, No Solo Política Comercial.
Muchos comentaristas sugieren que el deseo del expresidente Trump de imponer aranceles unilateralmente se debe a la sensación de poder y control que le otorgan, más que a objetivos económicos o de seguridad nacional genuinos.
- This is why he loves tariffs. Its the power he feels when he wields them. He wont easily give this up, even if scotus slaps his hand.
- Trump really just likes the power tariffs give him. Theyre a tool of coercion.
- To trump, the illegality of his unilaterally imposed tariffs seems to be a feature not a bug part of a concerted effort to barrel through the remaining checks being placed on executive power by congress and the supreme court.
4. Implicaciones Legales y el Papel de la Corte Suprema (SCOTUS).
El caso ante la Corte Suprema se centra en si leyes como la IEPA (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) delegan válidamente el poder de imponer aranceles al Presidente, o si su uso constituye una extralimitación inconstitucional.
- Ieepa, the law donald used to tariff the world, does not give president the power to tariff - only to regulate. And regulate is not tariff.
- Justice neil gorsuchs remarked that tariffs act as a one-way ratchet toward the gradual but continual accretion of power in the executive branch.
- Bessents supreme court confidence crashes 4624 post-oral arguments as justices shred tariff logic scotus weighs if tariffs are presidential power 88b refund risk, 95b gdp gain if repealed. Ruling for trump rewrites constitution.
5. Consecuencias Económicas y Políticos de la Guerra Comercial.
Los comentaristas señalan que los aranceles han provocado inflación, han dañado a los agricultores (requiriendo rescates financiados con esos mismos ingresos) y han generado inestabilidad económica, a pesar de las afirmaciones del Presidente sobre la generación de ingresos.
- Trumps trade wars are going to destroy this economy unless the courts and congress start to stop him. This is not his power to abuse.
- Insane -trump pushes nonsensical tariffs destroys agricultural markets. Our farmers lose their markets. Us citizens pay for tariffs on all goods.
- Trumps tariffs are making thanksgiving more expensive. Congress has the constitutional authority to levy tariffs -- its time we reclaim our power and end this unnecessarily costly and chaotic tariff war.