1. La Etiqueta de "Franquicia de Pobreza".
El término "franquicia de pobreza" es un insulto común utilizado por los aficionados para criticar a los equipos con mala gestión, bajo rendimiento, falta de inversión o instalaciones deficientes. Se aplica a menudo a organizaciones que parecen no estar seriamente comprometidas con la competición.
- Poverty franchise. Magat owners. Not serious about competing. Lucky to get to 84 wins this year.
- Yankees are such a poverty franchise. Cant even afford a roof for their little league ballpark.
- The bengals are a poverty franchise because they are buffoons. I have to assume it goes all the way to the top of ownership, because otherwise it could have been changed by now through simple job turnover.
- Look, there is no fan in america more qualified to talk about poverty franchises than my fellow mariners fans.
- Poverty franchise is my favorite. Like.ok, and you just lost to a poverty franchise 3-1. Whats that make you?
2. Propietarios Multimillonarios que Alegan Pobreza.
Existe una frustración generalizada entre los aficionados y los jugadores por la tendencia de los propietarios de equipos, a pesar de ser multimillonarios, a "llorar pobreza" durante las negociaciones de convenios colectivos o para justificar la falta de inversión en el equipo o en las instalaciones.
- Owners keep claiming poverty but wont prove it with their books. Take em for all their worth.
- The owners have cried poverty for longer than ive been alive and its simply not true. Its all about owners wanting to make oodles of money.
- Billionaires dont buy sports teams to make money they buy sports teams because they have money. Its a trophy acquisition. That billionaires are crying poverty over investing in their rosters is laughable.
- I think the real battle with the cba will be between the billionaires who spend on their teams and those who cry poverty.
- The problem is that theres no mechanism to force the lower revenue owners to invest the shared revenue into their teams, so owners pocket the money and then claim poverty.
3. El Deporte como Vía de Escape de la Pobreza.
El deporte profesional es visto como una de las pocas "loterías" o rutas para que las personas de entornos desfavorecidos, especialmente las minorías, logren riqueza generacional y saquen a sus familias de la pobreza. Sin embargo, esta narrativa a veces se utiliza para justificar salarios bajos en ligas menores o para crear "poverty porn" mediático.
- 2 a lot of the players grew up in poverty as well , so this gives some of them a chance to gain generational wealth and lift family out of poverty.
- Sport has proved a way out of poverty for some many brown and black people.
- For professional sports, its a sort of lottery for a handful of talented and driven people to claw their way out of poverty.
- If you grew up in some level of poverty and then gained financial comfort, maybe even generational wealth through playing football, of course youd do it all over again.
- Victor osimhen in a newly released uefa interview my mother passed away at a very young age. My older brother called, he said that my mother had slept and never woke up. When she left,it was really tough for the family. Football was the only escape route for me and my family to get out of poverty.
4. Estadios: Monumentos a la Pobreza de Nuestras Ambiciones Cívicas.
Una crítica recurrente en el archivo es el gasto público masivo en estadios deportivos, que se perciben como "parques de recreo para los ricos", mientras que las ciudades luchan contra altas tasas de pobreza, falta de vivienda y crisis de infraestructura.
- Sports stadiums are monuments to the poverty of our ambitions.
- Our stadiums are monuments to the poverty of our civic ambitions and our inability to summon the collective will to use the land we have for the things we need.
- Interesting article in the new york times sports stadiums are monuments to the poverty of our ambitions.
- Thanks to . For insisting that, in a city with one of the highest poverty rates in the nation, billionaire sports team owners should pay for the facilities that primarily benefit their businesses.
- If the last three arenas paid for by our tax dollars didnt solve poverty, why would a fourth one? this is not investing in our future. Its further divesting from working families, copsmetro leaders write.