1. Desconfianza institucional y el papel de Palantir.
Los ciudadanos expresan una profunda falta de confianza en la capacidad del gobierno para proteger sus datos, especialmente ante la posible subcontratación a firmas con historiales polémicos.
- The opposition to id cards in the uk mirrors our distrust of the political classes. What needs to be made absolutely clear is who has access to our personal data. And we cant be sure it wont be the likes of palantir, which will be bad news in the long run.
- Lmfao even the fucking palantir dont want to touch the uk digital id scheme. Saying it lacks democratic legitimacy imagine finding the fucking line that palantir wont cross.
2. Riesgos de privacidad y el surgimiento de un estado de vigilancia.
Existe un temor generalizado de que la unificación de bases de datos personales facilite un control social distópico y la vigilancia algorítmica de cada movimiento ciudadano.
- That moment folk start to understand palantir wants to slide digital id past any legal requirement and make us code. A code that runs through everything we do. Every transaction. Every movement. Every email, appointment, bill, booking. Every thing. Fully traceable and trackable. Facism in the uk.
- The government quietly admits police could access passport, driving licence, and future digital id photos for lfr. Add palantir ai tools into the mix and you have a recipe for dystopia. It doesnt matter what safeguards are in place because those safeguards can be removed at any point.
3. Comparativa con modelos europeos y soberanía de datos.
Los usuarios contrastan la propuesta británica con los sistemas de la Unión Europea, los cuales perciben como más seguros, regulados internamente y protegidos por el GDPR.
- Exactly. Other european countries that have id cards have strict control of their own data and protections in place. Wed have none of that with palantir in control.
- The uk is at a crossroads. It can have a digital id aligned to the eus eidas or palantir cia backed surveillance company in usa.
4. Críticas a la ideología y el liderazgo corporativo.
Se cuestionan los vínculos de los fundadores de Palantir con ideologías extremas y su influencia en la política nacional a través de contratos previos en salud y defensa.
- Just imagine with a company like palantir handling your data in the uk especially when id cards are introduced, will your data be safe or used for darker purposes for future unrest or conflicts? just look at peter thiels owner utter toxic fascistic ideologies!
- Palantir have government contracts for other unpopular policies. Im wondering why its just id cards they want out of? something smells wrong.
5. Impacto en grupos vulnerables y exclusión digital.
Se advierte que la obligatoriedad de una identificación digital podría marginar a minorías y personas con baja alfabetización tecnológica, beneficiando únicamente a los recolectores de datos.
- This will further exclude migrants and others without full documentation often an issue for care leavers, out trans people, and make escaping stalkers even harder. All so the govt has more data to sell to palantir.
- I know several people who are too elderly or unwell to manage a digital id card. Already excluded from hospital appointments as they cant use car park apps, how does excluding them from more support help them? and we give palantir unlimited access.