1. Definiciones y Límites del Discurso del Odio.
El discurso del odio es un concepto subjetivo y controvertido, con diferentes interpretaciones legales y sociales. Muchos argumentan que no debería estar protegido por la libertad de expresión, mientras que otros temen que su regulación pueda ser utilizada para censurar opiniones disidentes.
- A fine example of hate speech . Sadly it taints everything . It blinds and influences them to reality.
- Sigh how is it unclear that hate speech is not free speech. To allow hate speech is to normalize hate, which can easily slide into violence toward marginalized groups. As we are seeing.
- For a start, i dont agree with the concept hate speech at all. Anything legitimately problematic should be encompassed under abuse, threats etc.
2. La Libertad de Expresión vs. la Protección de Grupos Marginalizados.
Existe una tensión entre la defensa de la libertad de expresión, incluso para discursos ofensivos, y la necesidad de proteger a los grupos marginados de la discriminación y la violencia. Algunos argumentan que permitir el discurso del odio normaliza la intolerancia y puede incitar a la violencia.
- Hate speech toward marginalized people is not protected. Its not about contrary opinions. If you invite wolves to the sheep party, you end up with only wolves.
- Hate speech has never been, and will never be, protected free speech. Hate speech is vile and exists solely to spread disinformation and repress marginalized folks. If you think allowing hate speech to go without consequences is free speech, you need to go back to school and re-educate yourself.
- Hate speech is such a flagrantly subjective term with a record of abuse that i dont think these laws should be considered well intentioned.
3. Legislación y Consecuencias del Discurso del Odio.
Las leyes sobre el discurso del odio varían significativamente entre países. Algunos tienen leyes estrictas que penalizan la incitación al odio, mientras que otros, como Estados Unidos, protegen una amplia gama de expresiones bajo la Primera Enmienda. El debate se centra en si las consecuencias legales son necesarias para disuadir el discurso dañino.
- Hate speech does not exist legally in america. Theres ugly speech. Theres gross speech. Theres evil speech. And all of it is protected by the first amendment. Keep america free. Charlie kirk.
- Yeah, its protected first amendment speech if its what they want to say. Its impermissible hate speech inciting violence if they hate what youre trying to say. This is how fascism works.
- Imo the problem starts with the american conceptionfetishism of free speech. In the other democratic countries like canada, australia, and in europe, hate speech is not protected as free speech and is even a crime in some cases.
4. El Uso Político del Discurso del Odio.
El discurso del odio a menudo se utiliza como herramienta política para movilizar a los votantes y atacar a los oponentes. Esto plantea preguntas sobre la responsabilidad de los políticos y los medios de comunicación en la promoción de un discurso público más civilizado.
- There is a huge difference between free speech and hate speech. Politicians need to stop normalising this madness, its confusing the people who arent paying attention.
- Right wing logic any speech that exposes us is hate speech. Any speech that protects us is free speech.
- Politicians often use hate speech to build an electorate and appear strong. However, researchers from adam mickiewicz university showed that such content often backfires, harming its senders tinyurl.com2jmb5fxk socialpsyc.
5. La Subjetividad y el Abuso del Término "Discurso del Odio".
Muchos argumentan que el término "discurso del odio" es subjetivo y puede ser utilizado para silenciar opiniones impopulares o críticas. Existe preocupación de que las leyes contra el discurso del odio puedan ser utilizadas para reprimir la libertad de expresión y el debate público.
- How do you define hate speech? i am serious because the term has been watered down recently and can almost be applied to anything someone does not want to hear.
- Calling hate-speech hate-speech is now considered to be hate-speech. Intolerance of intolerance will not be tolerated.
- For anyone who forgot its not hate speech, its speech they hate. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. Pissedoffpundit.