1. La Calidad Cuestionable de la Ficción Creada por IA.
Existe un consenso generalizado de que la ficción generada por IA carece de originalidad, alma y calidad. Se la describe como estéril, sin vida y comparable a manuales de instrucciones o a fan fiction mal construido, incapaz de replicar la comunicación humana genuina que define a la literatura.
- Look, don't sweat ai. It can't write anything *good*. Anything it writes is as sterile and lifeless as the inside of an autoclave. It can produce informative books on any subject and they will all be well expressed but they'll read like instruction manuals for electric toothbrushes. Fiction is safe.
- Here's a thought. Ai doesn't just generate fiction. It specifically generates *fan* fiction. Highly derivative, poorly constructed fan fiction.
- The idea of read a novel or short story or poem or any creative writing generated by ai makes me feel physically sick. I don't care if it's "good". It would be dead. A dead thing with no energy or ideas behind it. Fiction is communication between humans. Ai product is nothing.
- All generative ai will ever be good at creating works of fiction. The problem is, the fiction they create is so boring and uncreative. All it does is make losers feel like artists, while they create nothing more than slop.
2. La Ciencia Ficción: Un Manual de Advertencias Ignorado.
Se expresa una frustración recurrente sobre cómo décadas de literatura y cine de ciencia ficción, que han advertido sobre los peligros de la IA, son ignoradas por los desarrolladores actuales. En lugar de tomar estas narrativas como cuentos con moraleja, parecen usarlas como un manual de instrucciones.
- Thot for the day : agentic able to act on it's own. My interpretation - designed to go rogue. This 'ai' shit is going to blow up badly in the most awful way. We're fooling ourselves into thinking it's a good thing. Have none of you read science fiction?
- I like how fiction has speculated about gen ai for decades and a bunch of fake tech nimrods decided that all of those warnings and dangers are actually great things. Far better than relying on human labor.
- Science fiction has been warning us about the dangers of unhinged ai for the past eighty years, and many of these works have become integral part of the common cultural canon. Yet all these warnings and teachings were disregarded for the sake of a few quick .
- Weird how like, every piece of media since the advent of science fiction as a genre that has touched on artificial intelligence has been a warning of how not to do artificial intelligence and yet here we are. Using the warning label as an instruction manual. :/.
3. La Brecha entre la IA de Ficción y la Realidad.
Se establece una clara distinción entre la IA sensible y consciente de la ciencia ficción y la tecnología actual. La IA real es descrita como un simple generador de texto, una "máquina de plagio" o un "autocompletado glorificado", muy lejos de las inteligencias artificiales representadas en la cultura popular.
- Reminder that artificial intelligence is just as much a science fiction fantasy today as it was 50 years ago. What we have are plagiarism machines. Theft bots.
- Also ai in fiction is actual artificial intelligence, and not a search engine in a slutty dress.
- Science fiction for about a century: humans create intelligent machines, but people don't think they're really alive and refuse to give them basic rights. Reality: humans create a random text generator and immediately decide it is super intelligent and sentient.
- The "ai" the tech industry is currently trying to push into everything is not the "ai" of science fiction. It's more mechanical turk ( ) than cyberdyne systems model 101. Openai wishes they could create skynet (as repugnant as that thought is).
4. La Incapacidad de la IA para Distinguir Realidad y Ficción.
Una de las críticas fundamentales es la incapacidad de la IA para diferenciar entre hechos y ficción. Al ser entrenada con vastas cantidades de texto sin contexto, la IA genera contenido plausible pero a menudo incorrecto, mezclando datos reales con invenciones, lo que la convierte en una fuente de información poco fiable.
- Ai doesn't know the difference between fiction and reality. I guess that's true of a lot of humans too.
- ".the nature of contemporary ai: that it can produce plausible text in response to prompts, but struggles to differentiate fact from fiction, and is of little use for discovering new knowledge.".
- Bending reality to suit their narrative. Oh and have some ai while you’re at it. It can’t tell fact from fiction, but don’t you worry about that either.
- You can’t prevent llm’s from making up shit without inventing a superior form of ai which is able to discern truth from fiction, which is far beyond the limits of any of the ai we’ve been able to produce.
5. El Dilema Ético y Moral del Uso de IA en la Creación.
El uso de IA para escribir ficción es visto como un problema moral y ético. Se considera una traición al oficio de escritor, una forma de corrupción creativa y una falta de respeto hacia el trabajo humano. La idea de publicar y vender obras generadas por máquinas es calificada como un acto de desconfianza y un "pecado sintético".
- If you have to use ai to write fiction. Maybe you aren't meant to write fiction dawg.
- This is, of course, about human-written fiction. Ai shit is bad, both in terms of quality and morality!
- While i’m in a fucking mood: selling me words built with ai is an instant, irrevocable termination of my trust in you as a human. I’m watching it infest erotica, fiction, marketing, everything. Synthetic fiction is the greatest sin of all, ever more so if you’re putting a price tag on it.
- The idea that a fiction writer would use ai to generate work intended for publication is horrifying to me. What's the joy in that as a creative person? the joy comes from the hard work, much of it arduous and time-consuming, self-discovery being the reward.