1. Detenciones Injustas y Consecuencias Devastadoras.
La inteligencia artificial, particularmente el reconocimiento facial, ha llevado a la detención y encarcelamiento de personas inocentes, a menudo por crímenes que no cometieron o en estados donde nunca estuvieron. Estas detenciones erróneas tienen consecuencias catastróficas, como la pérdida de hogares, vehículos y mascotas, y largos períodos de encarcelamiento sin debido proceso.
- The ai is a disgusting and dystopian special element but the real story is that after the cops arrested this lady with just a llm facial recognition suggestion and no other investigation she was in jail for 105 days before she saw a judge and got a chance to argue. Lost her home, car, and more.
- Recently a woman was arrested and transferred several states away to a place she had never been because facial recognition determined she was there and the police never questioned it.
- Ai is getting people slammed into jail for crimes they could not have committed! on facial recognition only! no police work on the case just ai !
- Tennessee grandmother jailed after ai facial recognition error links her to fraud.
- This should make people angry and scared. Law enforcement took the word of an ai facial recognition and required 6 months to figure out they were wrong. Poor woman lost her dog, house, and car too.
- Ai technology fails, again! a woman was arrested and detained for 5 months, for a crime she didnt commit in a place shes never been to. She isnt even a criminal.
- A grandmother was jailed for over 5 months for crimes in a state shes never visited. This technology is biased, inaccurate, and unreliable. It destroys lives.
- Ai facial recognition wrongly jailed angela lipps for 6 months. Her story exposes critical failures in police tech, human oversight, and the justice system.
- Grandmother jailed for 6 months after ai error linked her to a crime in a state she had never even visited, lawyers say.
- Angela lipps was babysitting four children when u.s. Marshals showed up with guns drawn. Fargo police had ided her using ai facial recognition. She spent 108 days in jail. Her bank records proved she was 1,200 miles away. She lost her house, car, and dog.
2. Falta de Responsabilidad y Prácticas Policiales Deficientes.
El problema no es solo la IA, sino la forma en que las fuerzas del orden la utilizan. Se critica a la policía por su "policía perezosa", por confiar ciegamente en los resultados de la IA sin verificación humana y por eludir la responsabilidad, lo que lleva a que nadie rinda cuentas por los errores.
- This isnt ai, this is lazy policing. Ai is just a newer way to avoid doing their job, and adds another layer of defused responsibility, so that no one person is held accountable.
- Maybe its not the ai but the police who use it and decide what to do with the results who are the problem?
- Cool, just what we needed, another way for police to escape accountability for their crimes by blaming ai.
- The problem is not just that ai is making some troubling mistakes, its that law enforcement seems not to be taking the slightest care to double-check what ai is telling it.
- I blame the cops who outsourced their job to ai. They chose to do no actual work and just believe the bullshit machine.
- Detectives assumed wrongly without confirming evidence. The problem wasnt the technologyit was people using it without proper safeguards. Every ai decision needs human eyes. Every time.
- This ai stuff should be banned. She was inappropriately detained for five months, because fargo police are lazy slobs.
- A lack of critical thinking is typical of ai and of many humans.
- A detective ran a face through a database, and that was it. No phone call, no records check and no basic police work. The ai said maybe, and he heard yes.
- Officers knew that angela was a tennessee resident, and we have seen no investigation by officers to determine whether she traveled to or was in north dakota at the time of the bank thefts.instead, an officer used ai facial recognition as a shortcut for basic investigation.
3. Sesgo y Falta de Fiabilidad de la IA.
Existe una fuerte desconfianza en la IA para fines de seguridad y justicia, debido a su inherente sesgo en los datos de entrenamiento y su propensión a errores. Se advierte que los sistemas de IA no son confiables, especialmente para la identificación de personas, y que sus fallos son más frecuentes en ciertos grupos demográficos.
- Also fuck them for using ai, the training data is inherently biased and its often wrong. No ai system should ever be trusted by security, law enforcement, or the courts.
- Ai is not reliable. Certainly not for this.
- This technology is biased, inaccurate, and unreliable. It destroys lives.
- The tech is not ready. Its best at identifying white men. It fails more often with everyone else.
- Ai facial recognition systems cant tell most people of the global majority apart. In one study, error rates are highest for black women, at 35 45.
- Ai facial recognition has been notoriously inaccurate, particularly in the case of black and brown people. Apparently not swift with white people either.
- The error rate is highest for black women, at 35-45.
4. Vigilancia Masiva y Preocupaciones por la Privacidad.
La expansión de la IA en la aplicación de la ley se percibe como un avance hacia un estado de vigilancia masiva, donde cámaras y sistemas de reconocimiento facial monitorean constantemente a los ciudadanos. Esto genera alarmas sobre la pérdida de privacidad, la recopilación de datos biométricos sin consentimiento y el potencial de un control social distópico.
- The tech bros want to surveil us in every aspect of our lives.
- National is expanding surveillance powers for police drastically by allowing them to use any form of recording of visual or audio data that they can capture from public or private places without any oversight. .then theres ai.
- Please dont rely on ai. It is easy to manipulate and will lead to loss of citizens privacy and security in the wrong hands.
- Also, please everyone, stop letting ai have your face andor voice - you are giving valuable biometric data to evil people who will use it against us all, i am sorry to say people are already being harmed by surveillance tech, including being nabbed for crimes they did not commit.
- We are increasingly moving toward a surveillance state. I dont want america to turn into a big brother bureaucracy. Ai cameras are everywhere and people are paying the price for their mistakes.
- Ai spy cameras suddenly blanketing america. When it comes to ai surveillance, regulations or privacy laws are next to nonexistent.
- There are now hundreds of millions of surveillance cameras worldwide, and ai can analyze all that footage at scale. What used to be watched occasionally is now tracked constantly. This isnt just technologyits infrastructure for mass surveillance.
- Cameras have quietly appeared in thousands of us cities now, their integration with ai is sounding alarms.
- Are you ready for real-time all-the-time surveillance of you and your family, by ai, and flagged to government agencies? its here.
- The public loathes ai and trusts law enforcement.
5. Demandas de Regulación y Acción Legal.
Ante los crecientes problemas, se exige una acción urgente para regular el uso de la IA en la aplicación de la ley. Se proponen leyes que prohíban el reconocimiento facial por IA, que establezcan que la IA no sea causa probable para un arresto, y que responsabilicen legalmente a las empresas de IA y a los departamentos de policía por los daños causados.
- This woman should sue the everlong shit out of the fargo police department. Fuck ai and fuck biometric surveillance.
- Ai must be halted.
- We need laws asap that anyone using ai in this manner cant blame the ai they relied on.
- Banning the use of ai facial recognition in crime prevention has got to become a thing.
- Ai needs to be explicitly legally ruled not to be probable cause or whatever other standard applies here.
- If this is indeed an ai error then thats a good argument for shutting down all government usage of ai until we have some borderline draconian guardrails, checks, and manual review of ai output before it translates to any real-world action. And everyone involved in this needs to rot in prison.
- Ai isnt probable cause. A tennessee grandmother sat in jail because facial tech output was treated as proof not a lead.
- The legal system that used the ai technology and caused such havoc in her life through wrongful conviction needs to compensate her. The only way to prevent ai mistakes cost from being borne by the victims is to make the users pay.
- Angela needs to sue everybody. The cops and the company marketing this obviously defective ai facial recognition program because both of these parties contributed to her losses.
- I hope she sues them for millions and wins. Ai is not as intelligent as everyone seems to think and no one should be using it blindly if at all.