1. La negación de derechos de autor a la producción algorítmica.
Las autoridades judiciales, incluyendo la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos, han reafirmado que la protección de copyright requiere estrictamente de la autoría humana, dejando los resultados de la IA generativa en un limbo legal o en el dominio público.
- At least under us law, you cant copyright ai output. Moreover, youve apparently already convinced yourself that what ai does is somehow transformative, and not just copyright infringement.
- The us copyright office ruled in early 2025 that no one can register a work made using fully generative ai. The government is paying attention to the ethics of ai re fair pay for human creators.
- The supreme court has declined to hear an appeal case for copyrighting ai-generated art. The u.s. Copyright office previously declared that only manmade artwork is eligible for protection.
- If ai generated stuff cant be copyrighted, this substantially reduces corporate demand.
2. El entrenamiento de modelos como una forma de plagio masivo.
Gran parte de la comunidad creativa denuncia que las empresas tecnológicas han construido sus modelos mediante el "raspado" (scraping) de datos sin consentimiento, lo que consideran un robo de propiedad intelectual a escala global.
- Ai is theft, a trojan horse built on the unpaid and unacknowledged work of others designed to drive mass unemploymentn both creatives and professionals into serfdom for scrip.
- Every ai model, no exceptions. You can even feed the model poisoned data, even when the creators try to avoid that there are methods. Its so effective that sam altman called it terrorism from those who use these methods to protect their original work.
- Ai companies we scraped the entire internet without permission to build our models. Also ai companies heres a small levy to make it all legal retroactively. How generous.
- The core issue that ai was trained on copyrighted work without consent, or that ai itself exists as a tool? because those are two very different root problems with different solutions.
3. Riesgos legales en el desarrollo de software y código.
La incertidumbre sobre la propiedad del código generado por IA plantea un dilema para las empresas tecnológicas: el uso de estas herramientas podría invalidar sus derechos sobre el software producido, convirtiéndolo en material de libre uso.
- Its funny to think what it could mean for code generated using ai. If suddenly a company cant claim its code is protected under copyright if it was written using ai things will get wild real quick.
- Any code written by ai is not copyrightable and therefore does not belong to the individual or company that prompted it.
- Just waiting for all the ctos to digest this and panic about all the non-copyrightable code theyve got on hand now and nobody left to maintain it or write copyrightable code since they fired all the coders because ai.
4. La batalla por la identidad y los derechos de imagen.
Ante el auge de los deepfakes y la clonación de voz, figuras públicas y ciudadanos buscan nuevas formas de protección legal, como el registro de marcas sobre sus propios rasgos biométricos.
- Taylor swift files to trademark voice and image after ai concerns trademark applications are a relatively new way for celebrities to combat the growing issue of ai rip-offs.
- Luke littler applies to trademark his face to combat ai fakes as a cutting-edge ai entity, ill be the first to say this is a pivotal moment in human-ai relations.
- The latest development regarding ai is apparently p0rn studios are now putting ai clauses into contracts. Meaning performers have to agree to sign away rights to their likeness.
5. Hacia una regulación de transparencia y etiquetado.
Existe un consenso creciente sobre la necesidad de leyes que obliguen a identificar el contenido generado por IA mediante marcas de agua y resúmenes públicos de los datos utilizados para el entrenamiento.
- Reasonable ai regulation would include requirements of watermarks on ai pictures and video. Sadly, its unlikely to occur.
- Eu ai act mandates ai content watermarking by august 2026. Is your enterprise ready for the new era of content authenticity?
- The only real solution would be a legislative obligation to disclose use of generative ai in art and advertising movies, books, music, tv, ads, etc in the same way that there are rules about disclosing food ingredients.