1. La IA como pretexto para el recorte de costes y despidos masivos.
Existe un consenso entre los trabajadores de que la tecnología no está eliminando empleos por su capacidad técnica, sino que los ejecutivos la utilizan como una narrativa conveniente para justificar despidos, reducir salarios y aumentar el valor de las acciones.
- Ai is not taking anyones job. Executives that are big ai sycophants are taking your job. The endgame? mass unemployment.
- Ai wont replace your job. Your company will use ai as cover to cut costs it was already looking for an excuse to cut. The automation narrative is convenient for executives.
- Tech ceos suddenly love blaming ai for mass job cuts. Why? the hypocrisy is staggering - it appears some tech ceos are attempting to deflect accountability for their companies mass job cuts onto the very ai.
2. El aumento de la carga laboral y la degradación de la calidad.
En lugar de liberar a los humanos de tareas tediosas, la implementación forzada de la IA está generando un fenómeno de "trabajo basura" (workslop), donde los empleados deben dedicar más tiempo a supervisar y corregir los errores constantes de las máquinas.
- Ai isnt even getting rid of jobs. Its just making work harder for the people that use it. Ai is being sold as labor saving but instead its just stress inducing for the people that use it.
- Everyone i know who is forced to use ai at work from editing to tech to finance are literally doing twice the work bc the ai gets shit wrong.
- For a lot of folks, they now get to babysit the ai and fix all the many, many mistakes it makes. Often these employees would rather do the work themselves as it would be better and quicker.
3. La paradoja económica del desempleo y el consumo.
Los críticos señalan una falla lógica en la estrategia corporativa: al eliminar masivamente los empleos humanos para ahorrar en salarios, las empresas están destruyendo la base de consumidores necesaria para comprar sus propios productos y servicios.
- Execs want to reduce their salary costs, not realising that salaries are the source of revenue.
- Who is ai for once everyone is unemployed? i just cant find any logic in it. I think not only is the artificial intelligence lacking, so too is the human intelligence.
- If ai eliminates white collar employment as a path to financial stability the political and economic consequences would be so dire i dont even really see any value in preparing for it.
4. La destrucción de la escalera de aprendizaje y el talento junior.
La automatización de tareas básicas está eliminando los puestos de nivel inicial, lo que impide que las nuevas generaciones adquieran la experiencia necesaria para convertirse en los expertos senior del futuro.
- It will devalue many white collar jobs and carry a lot of consequences to the reproduction of skilled labor thanks to obliterating entry level positions.
- It destroys the entry level jobs where one learns their craft methods, and proves their ability to do more. Its not just the jobs it eliminates, its that it destroys the skill ladder of the future.
- Great, but whos going to be telling the ai what to do when i retire and you never bothered training the next generation of workers?
5. La ironía del reemplazo de la clase ejecutiva.
Muchos usuarios argumentan que, dado que la IA es experta en generar discursos corporativos vacíos y tomar decisiones basadas puramente en métricas de eficiencia, los directivos y CEOs son en realidad los perfiles más fáciles de automatizar.
- The first position that needs to be replaced by ai is the ceo. Most cost effective move a company could make.
- Ai can already generate plausible-sounding and confidently wrong takes. Thats 90 of the job.
- Replace the ceo-class with something you might call baas. Bossing as a service. Your ai ceo never stiffs the rest of your workers for stock options.